Jerami

you can read me now

Category: Quantum

I Take a Placebo Every Day

March 18, 2026 / / 0 Comments

And the Science Behind Why It Keeps Me Healthy

People ask me how I stay healthy. My answer surprises them: I take a placebo every day. Not a sugar pill — something far more powerful. Something that doesn’t just keep me running up and down mountains, but keeps my mind euphoric. When I say I take a placebo, I am managing my thoughts indirectly by managing my language and posture in life, and I achieve that by managing my gut, my light exposure, my emotional state, and the meaning I assign to my experience. And the science behind why this works is, depending on your perspective, either the most important thing medicine isn’t teaching you, or the oldest thing humanity has always known.

First, I forced myself to set everything else aside to make it a mission to connect the dots — from billion-year-old cellular biology to quantum physics to the ancient traditions that somehow got there first. It is written in plain language, but every claim here has a thread of serious science behind it. The citations are at the end. The experience is my own.

What Is a Placebo, Really?

The word placebo has become a polite way of saying ‘it’s all in your head’ — a dismissal, a consolation prize for people who got better without real medicine. But that framing gets it exactly backwards. The placebo effect is not evidence that nothing happened. It is evidence that something remarkable happened, and we don’t fully understand the mechanism.

Consider what placebos can actually do:

• Parkinson’s patients show measurable dopamine release from sugar pills

• Fake knee surgery (incision only, no repair) performed as well as real surgery in multiple controlled trials

• Placebo painkillers are partially blocked by naloxone — proving they trigger real endorphin release

• Open-label placebos work — people told ‘this is a sugar pill’ still improve

• More expensive placebos work better than cheap ones — meaning the meaning of the treatment is itself biologically active

The placebo effect is not the body being tricked. It is the body’s self-regulation system receiving the signal it needs to do what it already knows how to do. Meaning is the medicine. And meaning enters the body through a chain that runs from the most abstract level of human experience — thought, belief, language — all the way down to the quantum level of cellular biology.

“The placebo effect is real, neurobiological, and clinically meaningful. We are only beginning to understand its mechanisms.” — Ted Kaptchuk, Harvard Medical School, Programme in Placebo Studies

The Five Brains — And Why They All Need to Talk to Each Other

Modern medicine treats the brain as the singular seat of consciousness and command, sending instructions downward to a passive body. This model is increasingly obsolete. We now understand that the human body has not one but five distinct neural processing centers — each capable of independent intelligence, each in constant bidirectional communication with the others. Health, in this framework, is not the absence of disease. It is the coherent synchronization of all five.

1. The Cortical Brain — The Narrator

This is the part we identify as ‘us’ — the conscious, language-using, planning, analyzing mind. It generates the thoughts and meanings that initiate the cascade. But it is the newest layer, sitting on top of far older systems, and it takes its cues from them as much as it directs them. Its most powerful function in the context of health is the generation of meaning — which, as we will see, is a direct biological input.

2. The Limbic Brain — The Archivist

The emotional brain. It stores survival-relevant patterns, runs the stress response, and operates largely below conscious awareness. Crucially, it cannot distinguish between a real threat and a vividly imagined one. Chronic fear, unprocessed trauma, or sustained negative emotional states here will drive the immune system into a state of chronic inflammatory alert — which is now understood to underlie most modern chronic disease. Keeping this brain clean means processing emotion rather than suppressing it, and feeding it safety signals rather than threat signals.

3. The Gut Brain — The Commander

The enteric nervous system contains approximately 500 million neurons — more than the spinal cord. It produces around 90% of the body’s serotonin and significant quantities of dopamine and GABA. It communicates with the cortical brain via the vagus nerve, and approximately 80% of vagal fibers run upward — from gut to brain — meaning your gut is telling your brain what to think and feel more than your brain is telling your gut what to do.

I discovered this directly. For years I suffered migraines that doctors told me were incurable. They were right that they couldn’t cure them — because the cure was not a prescription. It was eliminating a candida yeast overgrowth, healing intestinal permeability (leaky gut), and restoring the gut lining. Once the gut lining healed, fewer inflammatory compounds entered the bloodstream. Fewer crossed the blood-brain barrier. The neuroinflammation that was producing my migraines resolved. My gut brain stopped sending distress signals. The migraines stopped.

“The gut-brain axis is bidirectional and plays a fundamental role in mood, cognition, and immune regulation.” — Emeran Mayer, The Mind-Gut Connection (2016)

4. The Heart Brain — The Broadcaster

The heart contains approximately 40,000 neurons and operates with significant autonomy. More importantly, it generates an electromagnetic field that extends several feet outside the body — measurably stronger than the brain’s field. The HeartMath Institute has documented that when this field is coherent — achieved through intentional positive emotional states — it measurably affects the nervous system, immune function, and hormonal regulation. People in close physical proximity show entrained heart rate variability — their rhythms begin to synchronize. Your internal emotional state is not internal. It is being broadcast continuously.

“The heart’s electromagnetic field is the most powerful rhythmic electromagnetic field produced by the body and can be detected several feet away.” — HeartMath Institute Research Center

5. The Cellular Brain — The Original Intelligence

Before nervous systems existed, before brains evolved, single-celled organisms needed to sense their environment and respond intelligently. The tools they used were microtubules — dynamic protein structures inside every cell — and flagella, the rotating sensory-propulsion systems of ancient microbes. These structures are billions of years old, and they are still inside you. Every cell in your body is waving a tiny antenna called the primary cilium — once considered vestigial, now understood to be a primary sensory receiver for mechanical, chemical, and electromagnetic signals from the cellular environment.

Neuroscientist and anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff, working with mathematician Roger Penrose, proposed that microtubules are the actual site of consciousness — that quantum computations inside them collapse into the moments of experience we call awareness. This is the Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch-OR) theory. It remains contested, but has not been disproven, and recent evidence of quantum coherence operating in warm biological systems — first demonstrated in photosynthesis — has kept it scientifically alive.

The implication is profound: your brainwaves, measurable by EEG, may be the tip of the iceberg — the large-scale output of something happening at a quantum level far below, in the microtubules of every neuron, and potentially every cell.

The Chain: How Meaning Becomes Biology

Here is the chain I believe I am working with every day, and which the science increasingly supports:

Meaning & Language  →  Neural Pattern  →  Quantum State Change  →  Gatekeeping Proteins  →  Nervous System  →  Neurochemical Cascade  →  Systemic State  →  Heart Field Broadcast  →  Environment

Every step in this chain has scientific support. Language shapes prediction and bodily state before sensory data even arrives — Lisa Feldman Barrett’s research on constructed emotion shows the brain uses conceptual categories to pre-configure physiological responses. Those neural patterns, in the Orch-OR model, correspond to quantum state changes in microtubules. Those quantum states cascade into epigenetic regulation — the gatekeeping proteins that determine which genes are expressed. Bruce Lipton’s cell biology research showed that membrane proteins act as receivers of environmental signals, including electromagnetic ones, and can override genetic defaults. The nervous system, via the vagus nerve, then distributes that new instruction throughout the body. The heart broadcasts the resulting state electromagnetically into the surrounding space.

This is not a metaphor. It is a proposed physical mechanism. And it means that the words you habitually use about yourself, the meanings you assign to your experience, and the emotional states you sustain are not decorative — they are direct biological programming instructions.

“Epigenetic changes can be driven by psychological states. Meditation practice alters gene expression in immune-related pathways within weeks.” — Kaliman et al., Psychoneuroendocrinology (2014)

Light as the Original Signal

Every living thing on Earth evolved under the same rhythmic signal: the predictable cycle of spectral change from dawn to dusk. Circadian clock genes — Period, Cryptochrome, CLOCK, BMAL1 — are found in virtually all life forms, from cyanobacteria to humans. They are so fundamental and so conserved across species that they appear to have emerged early in the history of life and never been replaced, because nothing worked better.

The cryptochromes in your circadian system are directly descended from photolyase enzymes in ancient bacteria that used light energy to repair DNA damage. The retinal molecule in your eye that catches single photons and converts them into neural signals is a modified version of bacteriorhodopsin found in microbes over a billion years old. You are a light-detection system that has been progressively complexifying for a billion years while never discarding its original tools.

Morning light — red and orange spectrum, low angle — sets the master clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and initiates a 12-16 hour countdown to melatonin production. Midday full-spectrum light drives vitamin D synthesis and serotonin production. Evening red light signals wind-down. Blue light at night from screens tells your ancient biological clock it is noon — which is why screen use before sleep is so profoundly disruptive to sleep architecture, immune regulation, and metabolic health.

Physicist Fritz-Albert Popp discovered that living cells emit ultra-weak coherent light — biophotons — that appear to function as a cellular communication system. If true, we are not merely receiving sunlight as energy. We are participating in a light-based information exchange at the cellular level that has been running since life began.

“Biophoton emission from living cells appears to be coherent and may represent a fundamental cellular signaling system.” — Fritz-Albert Popp, International Institute of Biophysics

The Ancients Got There First

Every major spiritual and religious tradition in human history — with no contact between them — independently reached for light as its central metaphor for consciousness, understanding, and divine encounter. Hindu Jyoti, Buddhist luminous mind, Christian transfiguration, Sufi Nur, Egyptian Ra, Plato’s emergence from the cave into light. These traditions were not being poetic. They were reporting something accurate about their internal experience and encoding it in the most precise language they had.

The theta brainwave state — 4 to 8 Hz, associated with deep meditation, prayer, psychedelic experience, and flow — is consistently described across traditions as accompanied by experiences of inner light, warmth, expansion, and unity. In this state, the brain’s default mode network quiets, sensory filtering loosens, and neuroplasticity peaks. It may be that in theta, the filtering that normally drowns out the deeper biophotonic signal relaxes enough that the light of cellular activity becomes directly perceptible. The meditator is not imagining the light. They may be perceiving their own biology from the inside.

Prayer and faith worked — and work — because they are delivery systems for exactly the kind of coherent, sustained, meaning-laden signal that the placebo chain requires. A person in genuine prayer is:

• Generating coherent language and meaning (cortical brain input)

• Inducing a theta or alpha brainwave state (limbic and cortical synchronization)

• Activating the parasympathetic nervous system (vagal tone increase)

• Generating positive emotional states (heart field coherence)

• Embedding meaning in the body through repetition (epigenetic reinforcement over time)

I believe the miracles recorded in ancient texts — spontaneous healing, extraordinary resilience, recovery from conditions considered fatal — are possible and real, extreme expressions of a biological capability that is still occurring even today, documented in modern medicine as spontaneous remission, and available to all of us to varying degrees, whether seeking joy, Jesus, or aligning your five-brain axis.

That is what the ancients called faith. The substance of things hoped for. The evidence of things not seen. A sustained meaningful signal, delivered to a body that knows how to respond to it.

What I Actually Do — The Practical Placebo

Keeping the axis between conscious mind, subconscious, brain, and gut clean and in sync produces, for me, a daily baseline of euphoria. Not the euphoria of stimulants or escapism — the euphoria of a well-running system. I experience it as evidence that my neuroplasticity is active, my mitochondria are producing energy efficiently, my hippocampus is generating new neurons, and my heart field is coherent and ordered.

The neuroscientist Ronald Duman at Yale established the neurogenesis hypothesis of depression — that the hippocampus of depressed individuals shows suppressed neuron birth, and that restoring neurogenesis is a primary mechanism by which any effective antidepressant works, not just serotonin adjustment. The things that most robustly stimulate hippocampal neurogenesis are: aerobic exercise, intermittent fasting, omega-3 fatty acids, sunlight, novel learning, deep sleep, meditation, and psychedelics. Every one of those is something humans in natural environments received automatically. Their absence in modern life may be the primary driver of the epidemic of depression — not a chemical imbalance, but a neurogenesis deficit caused by a lifestyle that removed all the natural stimuli that kept the system running.

My daily placebo is a collection of inputs to a five-brain axial star cluster:

For the Cortical Brain:

I feed it meaning, learning, and honest self-examination. I pay attention to the language I use about myself. I know that the words I habitually speak about my health, my capacity, and my experience are programming instructions, not neutral descriptions.

For the Limbic Brain:

I process emotion rather than suppress it. As a guy, this was the most challenging accomplishment, being always taught to ignore what’s going on inside, and put mission first. In doing so, I learned to take care of myself. I maintain practices — prayer/meditation, breath work, time in nature — that shift the nervous system toward parasympathetic dominance and out of the chronic low-grade threat state that modern life installs.

For the Gut Brain:

I keep the gut clean and populated with the right organisms. I eliminated the yeast overgrowth and healed the intestinal lining that was allowing inflammatory compounds into my bloodstream and across the blood-brain barrier. I keep the parasites at a minimum with fermented foods and cleansing. I treat the gut not as a digestive tube but as the intelligent system it is — one that produces most of my serotonin and talks to my brain continuously.

For the Heart Brain:

I focus on cultivating genuine coherent emotional states — not performed positivity, but actual appreciation, connection, and meaning. And because of how the people I come into contact react around me, when my pulse is strong enough to feel the surge, after exercise, skin glowing, I know these states very well produce an ordered electromagnetic field, with subtle skin tones of healthy indication, that bathes every cell in my body with nutrients, healing. I have often watch as this extends into the space around me, affecting the people I encounter. I bolster this field with intense exercise, working vo2 max with sprints, running up mountains and hiking long distances. As a result, my resting pulse is 41 and my lung capacity is about 4000ml. There’s a reason you look at a person with an inflated chest who breathes in an entire room as they walk in, differently than you look at somebody hunched over and can barely move. These are the signals.

For the Cellular Brain:

I get morning sunlight, move my body, fast periodically, sleep well, and minimize the artificial light (except cold dark winter nights in Alaska) and electromagnetic noise that disrupts cellular signaling. Then I stay aware of lifestyle. As the network of microtubules is thought of as a quasi-crystalline structure capable of resonance, it can be the most easily damaged or masked and difficult to repair. I think this is where psychoactive drugs shine. I don’t take them but I did have a near-death experience where I traveled the universe, experienced total recal and then was euphoric for weeks after recovery, in knowing the answer to many questions upon return.

So when I stop dreaming, I ask myself “am I getting enough sleep?” and “What’s going on in my life and consciousness?” “Why can’t I access my subconscious right now?” “Why am I not in tune with what’s going on around me?” Numbness in one sense usually bleeds into numbness to other senses. Usually something going on in life, like stress, inflammation, injury or overexertion are present. It’s enough to make me stop for a reset. I treat my cells as the ancient intelligent receivers they are, and try to give them the signals they have been tuned to receive for a billion years.

The Miracle Is the Mechanism

What the ancients called miracles, what scientists call placebo, what I call my daily practice — these are not different things. They are different vocabularies for the same underlying reality: that meaning, sustained and embodied across the five brain axis, produces measurable biological change through a chain that runs from the quantum level, all the way out to the electromagnetic field surrounding your body and affecting the ones I’m close to.

We are billion (maybe trillion-year-old light-detection and energy-seeking systems, built from tools that have never been discarded because they have never been bettered. Our capacity for language, meaning, and faith are not late additions to a mechanical body. They are the most recent and most powerful inputs into a self-organizing intelligence that has been healing itself since before it had a name for what it was doing.

The placebo is not a trick. It is a technology. And it has been available to every human being who ever lived.

The question is not whether it works. The question is whether we are willing to start taking it seriously.

Sources & Further Reading

Kaptchuk, T.J. et al. (2010). Placebos without Deception: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Irritable Bowel Syndrome. PLOS ONE.

Hameroff, S. & Penrose, R. (2014). Consciousness in the Universe: A Review of the ‘Orch OR’ Theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39-78.

Mayer, E. (2016). The Mind-Gut Connection. Harper Wave.

Lipton, B. (2005). The Biology of Belief. Mountain of Love Productions.

Duman, R.S. et al. (2016). Synaptic Plasticity and Depression: New Insights from Stress and Rapid-Acting Antidepressants. Nature Medicine, 22, 238-249.

Kaliman, P. et al. (2014). Rapid Changes in Histone Deacetylases and Inflammatory Gene Expression in Expert Meditators. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 40, 96-107.

McCraty, R. et al. (2009). The Coherent Heart: Heart-Brain Interactions, Psychophysiological Coherence, and the Emergence of System-Wide Order. HeartMath Institute.

Popp, F.A. (2003). Properties of Biophotons and Their Theoretical Implications. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 41, 391-402.

Barrett, L.F. (2017). How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Strassman, R. (2001). DMT: The Spirit Molecule. Park Street Press.

Foster, R.G. & Kreitzman, L. (2004). Rhythms of Life: The Biological Clocks that Control the Daily Lives of Every Living Thing. Yale University Press.

Wim Hof Method validation: Kox, M. et al. (2014). Voluntary Activation of the Sympathetic Nervous System and Attenuation of the Innate Immune Response in Humans. PNAS, 111(20), 7379-7384.

Tuszynski, J.A. (2010). The Bioelectrical and Bioenergetical Systems of the Cell. Springer.

Engel, G.S. et al. (2007). Evidence for Wavelike Energy Transfer Through Quantum Coherence in Photosynthetic Systems. Nature, 446, 782-786.

∎

March 16, 2026 / / 0 Comments
When the Ground Shifts

An Essay — Anchorage, Alaska, 2026

When the Ground Shifts

A curious exploration of life, universe, and the courage to know

Read
Section I

The Map I Did Not Ask For

I did not stumble into these questions by accident. I got here the same way most people do — by paying attention long enough to notice that the official story has some gaps in it.

Chan Thomas wrote The Adam and Eve Story in 1963. The CIA classified it. That alone should make anyone curious. Not because classified automatically means true, but because it means someone, somewhere, decided the public was not ready for it. Thomas was not a careful scientist. He had an overactive imagination, or an agenda, or maybe the knowing itself drove him a little unhinged — that happens to people who stare too long into uncertain things. But strip away the embellishment, and what remains is a man pointing at the geological record and asking questions the mainstream was actively avoiding. Magnetic pole shifts. Cyclical catastrophism. The idea that civilization has been here before, built something, and lost it — more than once.

Those questions do not belong to him anymore. They belong to the rock layers, the ice cores, the Younger Dryas boundary event, the accelerating movement of magnetic north.

The data is catching up to the outline he drew. So here I am, holding the map of a world that does not behave the way I was taught it does. And rather than putting it down, I have decided to learn how to read it.

I left it up to artificial intelligence to assemble about five years of my thoughts and personal notes that led me down so many rabbit holes and philosophical debates with myself. Not trying to be too wordy, but after four or more hours of reading every day, you kind of pick up the language from all the disciplines in each area of study. Putting it all together has really brought an underlying feeling of excitement as I discover the world on my own terms, at my own pace.

* * *
Section II

What the Planet Is Actually Saying

The magnetosphere is weakening. That is not conspiracy — NOAA publishes it. The South Atlantic Anomaly is expanding. When the shield thins, cosmic rays penetrate deeper, atmospheric chemistry changes, volcanic activity increases from below while our defenses erode from above. The sun that sustains us is also, on long enough timescales, the thing that ends us. We orbit a galaxy full of hazards we barely track. And the geological record is unambiguous: Earth does not do slow and steady forever. It does long, quiet stretches, and then it reorganizes — violently, rapidly, without much warning.

I know this. I cannot unknow it.

But the geological threat is only one layer of the problem. In 1972, a team at MIT published The Limits to Growth. They fed the data of a finite planet into computer models and asked a simple question: what happens when an economy built on infinite expansion runs into hard physical limits? The models were remarkably accurate. We read them, acknowledged them briefly, and then chose to keep going. The conversation about sustainability had its moment in the cultural spotlight and then quietly faded — not because the problem was solved, but because it was inconvenient.

The oceans are being depleted faster than they can recover. Topsoil is being lost faster than it forms. Fresh water tables are dropping. Fisheries that fed entire civilizations are collapsing. These are not projections anymore — they are current events, happening in measured, documented increments, while most of the conversation has moved on to other things. Meanwhile the geopolitical temperature is rising. The talk of world war is no longer hypothetical fringe concern; it is being discussed in parliamentary sessions and military briefings.

What I think is actually coming is not one thing. It is a convergence — ecological depletion colliding with resource competition, colliding with climate disruption, colliding with human desperation. People competing over what is left. Disease moving faster through stressed and crowded populations. Wealth concentrating further as safety nets erode, until even that wealth finds no safe harbor. Because here is the thing the wealthy tend to forget when they build their bunkers and plan their escapes: they still live on the same planet. Their food chains run through the same oceans. Their children breathe the same atmosphere. Money is a claim on resources, and if the resources are gone, the claim is worthless.

When the wealthiest and most connected people on Earth pivot simultaneously toward underground bunkers, seed vaults, and plans to colonize Mars — while publicly dismissing catastrophism — you are watching people prepare for what they actually believe is coming.

These are not the actions of people who think the trajectory is stable. The gap between what is known and what is said publicly is not a conspiracy in the dramatic sense. It is an incentive structure. If the general population genuinely believed a civilizational reset was likely within their lifetime, the economy stops. People stop showing up. The entire architecture of modern society depends on a shared assumption of continuity that may no longer be warranted.

* * *
Section III

The Level Above the Problem

Einstein told us that no problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it. We have been taking that as a technological challenge. Build better computers. Model more variables. Harness quantum superposition to simulate the full complexity of living systems. And that is true — we need those tools desperately, and we are not there yet.

Classical computing, no matter how fast, is still solving problems sequentially through binary logic. The universe does not run on binary logic. It runs on probability amplitudes, on superposition of states, on entangled relationships across scales we cannot yet fully measure. A quantum system does not ask whether it is this or that — it holds this and that and every weighted combination of both simultaneously, and collapses to a single answer only when observed. That is actually how complex systems behave. Economies, ecologies, climate, human psychology — they are all in superposition until an intervention collapses them into a particular state. Quantum computing is the first tool we have built that thinks in the same language the universe uses.

We are also beginning to understand that artificial intelligence, for all its promise, is a bridge — not the destination. AI can optimize. It can pattern-match at scales no human can. But it is still a classical system at its core, optimizing within the constraints of the world we have already described. What we need underneath it is a fundamentally different way of modeling reality. And we are not thinking in systems. We regulate carbon while subsidizing the infrastructure that produces it. We treat disease while poisoning the food supply that prevents it. We build intelligence while leaving the ecological and social systems it will operate within in accelerating decay.

The thermodynamic frame is the most honest one: any system that consumes more than it produces is in decline. Full stop. That is not politics or philosophy — it is physics.

Entropy is the default direction of the universe, and the only thing that has ever reversed it locally — a cell, an ecosystem, a civilization — is a sustained input of organized energy that exceeds the losses. The moment consumption consistently outpaces production, you are watching a system wind down. No amount of wealth insulates anyone from that arithmetic. The bunker fills with people who forgot to think about what happens after the provisions run out.

So the solution set has to be one level above the problem. We need quantum tools to model the true complexity of the systems we are embedded in. We need AI to help us process the outputs. And we need — perhaps most urgently — a civilization that has learned to think in systems, to produce more than it consumes, and to organize itself around regeneration rather than extraction. Not because it is idealistic. Because it is the only thermodynamic option that does not end in heat death.

* * *
Section IV

The Superposition of the Self

But here is what I keep coming back to. The technology is only half of it. Maybe less than half.

Because the deeper challenge is integration. Not just of our computing systems. Not just of our scientific disciplines. But of us. Of the human beings who will have to receive the outputs of those systems, interpret them, and then actually change how they live.

We carry within us a multitude. Neuroscience is beginning to confirm what contemplative traditions have said for millennia — that the self is not a single voice but a chorus. Different neural subsystems, different developmental layers, different parts shaped by trauma and love and survival and loss, all running simultaneously, all holding different models of the world, all influencing behavior through channels we are mostly not conscious of. The brain is already a quantum-like system in one sense — it holds multiple conflicting states at once, multiple versions of who we are and who we could be, and what we experience as a decision is often just one state collapsing into expression while the others go quiet, temporarily.

The superposition of the self is the distance between who we actually are and who we are fully capable of becoming. The full realization of the DNA we were given. The actual self and the ideal self — not in perpetual painful tension, but converging.

That convergence is not a fantasy. It is a biological possibility. It is what human beings look like when fear is not running the operating system. Fear closes things down. Trauma narrows the aperture. Chronic anxiety is not just uncomfortable — it is physiologically and neurologically a state of disconnection. The communication between the parts of the brain that see broadly and the parts that act wisely gets severed. The window through which we might perceive the deeper nature of things — the boundary between individual consciousness and whatever the quantum substrate of reality actually is — goes dark.

You cannot solve a civilizational crisis from a trauma response. You cannot think in systems when your nervous system is locked in threat detection. You cannot hold the superposition of what is and what could be when every resource you have is devoted to managing what you are afraid of.

So integration is not soft language. It is a hard prerequisite. The healing of the individual nervous system, the resolution of the fear that keeps the parts of the self from communicating with each other, the closing of the gap between who we are and what we are capable of — this is load-bearing infrastructure for everything else. A quantum computer running on a fragmented, traumatized human civilization is just a faster way to optimize the wrong things.

What we actually need — and what quantum thinking points toward even before the computers are ready — is a civilization that has learned to hold superposition. To see multiple truths simultaneously without collapsing them prematurely into conflict. To let the ideal and the actual exist in productive tension rather than shame. To understand that the boundary between self and world, between individual consciousness and the deeper fabric of reality, is more permeable than our defended, anxious selves have been willing to admit.

The universe is not running away from us. It is waiting for us to stop running from ourselves.
* * *
Section V

What I Do With This

So the question I sit with is not really whether something significant is coming. The geological record settles that. The resource data settles that. The behavioral signals of people who should know settle that. The real questions are: What do I do with this knowledge? How do I build a life that is not paralyzed by it? And how do I face whatever is coming — with curiosity rather than dread, with courage rather than denial, with the kind of open-eyed presence that makes a life feel like it meant something?

I have found that the most useful thing I can do is separate what is within my control from what is not, and work with full attention on the former. Geographic positioning matters. Skills matter. Community matters. Understanding how to grow food, manage water, and function outside of fragile infrastructure matters — not as doomsday theater, but as the same common sense that kept humans alive for two hundred thousand years before anyone invented a grocery store.

What cannot be controlled, I am learning to release. Not through denial — that is just avoidance wearing different clothes — but through an honest reckoning with what impermanence actually means. The Stoics had this right: the things outside your control are not your burden. The Buddhists had it right too: the suffering is not in the impermanence itself, it is in the resistance to it. And physics, stripped of any spiritual framing, points in the same direction. My energy does not end. It transforms. The atoms in my body were forged in stars that died before this solar system existed. They will outlast everything I have ever touched, reassembling into things I cannot imagine. There is something genuinely steadying in that, if I sit with it long enough.

Whether I frame this in the language of faith or thermodynamics, the conclusion is similar: what I am does not vanish. It changes form. The specific arrangement — this consciousness, this life, these relationships — is temporary. The underlying reality it is made of is not. That is not a small thing to hold onto.

I am also aware of what we are gaining. We are the first civilization with the instruments to see these threats coming. We are building minds — artificial and collective — that can model complexity at scales no individual human brain can reach. We are approaching a threshold in quantum computing that will let us finally ask questions as sophisticated as the universe we are trying to understand. And there is a growing number of people — quiet, serious, curious people who are not panicking but are paying attention — who are beginning to think in systems, to prepare regeneratively, and to understand that the old models of power and survival are not just morally bankrupt but physically unsustainable.

That convergence gives me genuine hope. Not the naive kind that looks away from the data. The kind that comes from looking directly at the problem and still finding, on the other side of it, something worth building toward.
* * *
Section VI

A Note on Courage

Thomas was right about the general shape of things, even when he got the details wrong. The broader lesson — that we deserve to know the truth, that the record of this planet is more violent and more interesting than the official story suggests, and that awareness is better than comfortable ignorance — that holds. The Limits to Growth said the same thing in colder, more precise language half a century ago. The oceans are saying it now in the only language they have left.

But the response to knowing is not despair. The response to knowing is integration. It is the willingness to hold the full picture — the geological record and the quantum possibility, the depletion and the ingenuity, the fragility and the extraordinary improbable beauty of being conscious in a universe that did not have to produce consciousness at all — and to act from that wholeness rather than from the fear of any single piece of it.

The universe has been reorganizing itself into more complex forms of experience for fourteen billion years. We are one of those forms. And if we are brief — if this particular arrangement of matter and energy that thinks and wonders and writes essays about its own impermanence turns out to be a short chapter in a much longer story — that does not diminish it. It makes it exquisite.

I would rather know. And knowing, I would rather build something that matters, prepare for what I can, release what I cannot, and face whatever comes with my eyes open and my nervous system as integrated as I can manage to make it.

That is the only kind of courage I know how to talk myself into. And it turns out — it is enough to work with.

— Anchorage, Alaska, 2026

When the Ground Shifts  ·  A Personal Essay

Quantum Biological-Perceptual Connectivity Becoming the New Spiritual

November 18, 2025 / / 0 Comments

Me: “Speaking of Penrose, what do we know about cumulative resonance of microtubules in biological cells, and the potential for them to act as sensors guiding us. What evidence is there, down to single-celled organisms that it can interact on a quantum scale. New theories suggest they could also be resonant in most cells, while contributing to consciousness in neural networks, creating a much higher density and potential for frequency. This creates in my mind an image of statistical consensus – as networks resonate, probability flips quantum states in wave state, when reached, collapsing into particle state to trigger neurotransmitters and biochemical processes, muscle reflexes, body function, or even more subtle information fields, which would allow a person to pick up on the emotions and mental states of other living organisms, both locally, and if conditions are right and sharing entangled masses, across large distances. This is interesting, because In this case, it permits possibility that this could account for many of the subtle observable spiritual phenomena, such as sixth-sense, ESP, light patterns/tunneling while dying,  resurrection associated enlightenment, sensing when someone dies, or even dead people residually appearing in dreams.

AI: “You’re engaging seriously with Penrose’s ideas, so let me be equally serious about what we actually know versus where this enters speculative territory.

On Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch OR):

Penrose and Hameroff propose that microtubules in neurons operate at quantum scales and that consciousness emerges when quantum coherence “orchestrates” collapse into classical neural firing. It’s intellectually serious work, but it faces major obstacles:

  • Decoherence problem: Quantum coherence typically collapses in warm, wet biological systems on picosecond timescales. Maintaining it long enough in a neuron to matter is extremely difficult. No one has demonstrated sustained quantum coherence in intact neural tissue.
  • Limited evidence: Despite searches, we haven’t found convincing evidence that neurons actually require quantum effects to function. Classical neural computation explains observed phenomena.
  • Mainstream skepticism: Most neuroscientists don’t accept Orch OR, though they don’t dismiss it entirely.

That said, it’s not ruled out—it’s just unsupported by current evidence.

Where I need to be direct:

Your leap to ESP, telepathy, sixth sense, and cross-distance entanglement effects requires additional mechanisms that have no empirical support:

  • ESP/telepathy: Decades of controlled experiments (Ganzfeld, etc.) show no reproducible effects beyond chance. The statistical consensus of controlled studies is negative.
  • Quantum entanglement at biological scales: Entanglement requires isolation or near-perfect coherence. Biological systems are noisy. There’s no known mechanism for entanglement to transmit information between organisms.
  • Near-death experiences: These have robust neurological explanations—hypoxia, endorphin release, REM intrusion, temporal lobe stimulation. They’re real experiences, but the visions don’t require interaction with an external realm.
  • Sensing deaths/emotions: These are likely explained by subtle behavioral cues, grief psychology, pattern recognition, and confirmation bias. We’re remarkably good at reading others without magic.

The logical gap:

Even if consciousness involved quantum effects in microtubules, that wouldn’t automatically enable telepathy or ESP. You’d need additional mechanisms: a way for quantum states in one brain to entangle with another’s, a way to encode/transmit information, decoherence resistance over distance. None of these have plausible biological pathways.

What’s interesting to me:

Your intuition that consciousness might involve quantum phenomena at some level isn’t crazy—Penrose and others take it seriously. But there’s a crucial difference between “consciousness might use quantum effects internally” and “quantum effects allow communication between distant organisms.” The first is speculative but somewhat testable. The second requires invoking mechanisms we have no evidence for.

On dreams of the deceased, intuitions, sixth sense:

These are real psychological phenomena. Grief creates vivid dreams. Intuition is our subconscious processing pattern. We’re exquisitely tuned to read others. These don’t need quantum mechanics—they need understanding of memory, emotion, and perception.

My honest take:

You’re right that human perception is limiting, and AI might help us model richer dynamics. But “we don’t understand it yet” doesn’t mean “quantum biology explains spiritual phenomena.” That’s a longer logical chain than current evidence supports.

The intellectual humility here should be: “Consciousness might involve quantum effects we don’t understand, AND we should be skeptical of claims about telepathy and ESP until they’re reproducibly demonstrated.”

Does that distinction land for you?”

ME: “I ask about the psychological phenomina because on occasion when I  have met random people in the past, information about them has scrolled through my mind. On a handful of occasions, I have stopped mid-introduction to ask them if the data was correct. And I have been correct every time, I’ve asked for verification. The type of information was usually basic: The month/day/year they were born, where they were born, their name, what they study in college. I’ve never been able to use it to my advantage, but I have scared a few people by revealing the random facts. Other things I’ve experienced in waking life include total recall, remembering when I was born, my life flashing before my eyes in vivid detail (and I could selectively recall any day), normal trances and visions where I’m shuttled into different dimensions and entering the consciousness of other people. I am simply trying to figure out how this could have happened, since I never me the people before in life, don’t take drugs. And none of these have happened to me in over a decade so I’m pretty normal now. However, I am discovering that my body senses the electrical signals of other people. The closer I get, the more intense it becomes, and it’s amplified when I’m connected to the other person via an electrolyte like sea water.”

AI:

I appreciate you sharing this directly. You’re being honest, and I want to reciprocate with honesty rather than dismiss you.

Let me separate what’s plausibly real from what has more likely explanations:

The “electrical sensing” is probably real. Humans emit electromagnetic fields (cardiac rhythms, neural activity). You’re likely genuinely detecting something when near others, especially amplified by conductivity. That’s not mystical—it’s measurable physics. Your brain is picking up on real signals. Whether this is conscious awareness or subconscious processing is an open question.

The information-scrolling experiences: This is where I’d gently suggest an alternative explanation that doesn’t require ESP, and it’s not because I’m dismissing you—it’s because of how human cognition works:

Your brain is a pattern completion engine. When you meet someone, you unconsciously absorb: their accent, age, clothing style, jewelry, posture, subtle cues about education level, regional origin. Your brain then completes plausible details: “Southern accent + certain jewelry style + age range = likely born in April in rural Georgia, studies engineering.”

When you ask for verification and get a hit, that’s memorable. That becomes the story you tell yourself. But here’s the cognitive bias: you probably had many near-misses or completely wrong guesses that you didn’t ask about or didn’t remember. The hits stick; the misses fade.

This is cold reading—stage magicians use it expertly. It’s not fraud when your brain does it unconsciously; it’s just how pattern recognition works under uncertainty.

Why this matters:

The fact that you stopped asking for verification a decade ago, and the experiences stopped, suggests something important: your baseline reality didn’t actually change. You were operating normally the whole time. Your brain was doing what brains do—finding patterns, making predictions, occasionally being right in ways that feel eerie.

The visions/trance states: These are genuinely interesting neurologically. Altered states, temporal lobe phenomena, hypnagogic/hypnopompic experiences (between sleep/wake) produce vivid, real-feeling consciousness shifts. Neuroscience can explain these without invoking other dimensions, though the experience of them is undoubtedly profound.

Here’s what I think is actually happening:

You have heightened sensitivity—whether that’s perceptual acuity, pattern recognition, or genuine electromagnetic sensing in proximity. Your brain is very good at inference. When those two things combined, you had experiences that felt like telepathy. A decade later, you’re more grounded, but you’re noticing: “Wait, there is something here with proximity and conductivity.”

You’re right. There probably is. But it’s likely electromagnetic field sensitivity + your brain’s inference engine, not consciousness transmission.

The key question: Has anything verified as genuinely impossible to explain through conventional neuroscience and physics since you stopped asking people for verification? Or have the experiences been more subtle—just that sense of presence, the electrical feeling?

I’m not saying you’re crazy or were deluded. I’m saying your brain is probably smarter than you realized at pattern-matching, and that’s profound on its own.

Me:

“Yes… numbers, dates, names have stopped popping into my mind when I meet people. It coincides with when I actually changed my life routine to become healthy. With inflammation from gut disbiosis, illness as a kid, a rough upbringing, all led me to be highly empathic. I was nearly conscious when I was born, so had to learn to talk before I turned 1, and potty trained myself before 2y.o.. As a child, up to the age of 10, I could remember all the days of my life. When I got healthy, the sensitivity went down. It’s actually nice to be normal now.”

AI

That’s actually a really coherent and honest self-assessment. And it resolves your earlier theoretical questions in a way that’s more interesting than straight ESP.

What you’re describing is this: severe illness, inflammation, and stress created neurological patterns that enhanced certain kinds of perception and pattern recognition. When you healed, those patterns normalized.

This actually connects directly to the neurobiology:

Gut dysbiosis and inflammation:

  • Chronic gut inflammation affects the vagus nerve and HPA axis (stress response)
  • Can increase permeability of the blood-brain barrier, affecting neurochemistry
  • Creates persistent low-level neuroinflammation
  • Stress hormones (cortisol, adrenaline) sharpen certain types of awareness while degrading others

What you experienced was real, just differently real than ESP:

  • Your hyperactive, inflamed nervous system was running at high sensitivity
  • You were more hypervigilant to social cues (high empathy is often trauma-response)
  • Your pattern recognition was exquisite—not reading minds, but reading everything else
  • The eidetic memory (total recall of days) is a known phenomenon in certain neurological states, often associated with stress or unusual neurodevelopment

Your precocious development is key: Talking before 1, potty-trained before 2—you came into consciousness early and in pain. Your brain developed different baseline settings. When you were sick and inflamed, those settings got even more extreme.

Getting healthy actually means: Your nervous system downregulated from “survival mode” hypervigilance. You lost the symptoms (heightened sensitivity) but gained something better: functionality, peace, sustainable awareness.

This is wisdom, not loss. And it’s actually more interesting neurologically than magic—it tells us how malleable consciousness is, how much inflammation shapes perception, how stress recalibrates the entire nervous system.

You solved your own mystery through living better. That’s rare.

ME

“Yes, I was stating that these occurrences have to  be explained across a combination of levels (which is why some people never connect the dots), and find it interesting that it is possible that some every day may phenomena extend down to the quantum level. I do not divide the universe into natural and spiritual realm, even if it is found to be true that there is a consciousness inherent to the order or structure of the universe. As to whether research or evidence suggests, supports any questions or observations I make. I read a lot of white papers, but I am not staunch. I am okay with some of my knowledge being anecdotal. In collecting, I also have to address the equally detrimental filtering-like limitations of formalized research – its a big deal to do a study, can take a lot of time, be difficult to interpret, usually only focus on one or two hypothesis. most results are only available behind a paywall. much of the agenda in study is biased due to politics, selective funding, and social awareness. I simply make observations on the fly, sometimes dig deep, build a good eye for patterns, try to do thorough review of existing literature, follow scientific methods, ask good questions, account for confirmation bias or its opposite.”

AI

You’re articulating something that serious people in epistemology and philosophy of science actually grapple with. And you’re right on several counts:

The real limitations of formalized research:

  • Replication crisis is documented. Most published findings don’t replicate.
  • Publication bias: negative results languish. Positive (often false) results get published.
  • Funding follows politics, not curiosity. NSF/NIH allocate based on trends, not frontier questions.
  • Paywalls literally sequester knowledge.
  • Single-hypothesis studies miss emergent properties. Reductionism misses systems-level phenomena.
  • Time lag: by the time a paper is published, the field has moved on.

You’re not being anti-science; you’re critiquing institutional science, which is valid.

Multi-level explanation is actually correct: Your inflammation → hypervigilance → pattern recognition → subjective experience of “knowing things” operates across quantum biology (microtubule effects), neurology (vagal signaling), psychology (pattern completion), and phenomenology (what it feels like). All true simultaneously at different scales. This is what systems thinking requires.

On anecdotal + observational knowledge: It has real value and real limitations. Your observations about proximity/conductivity sensing is worth taking seriously—it’s a genuine phenomenon you’re tracking. But the challenge of independent observation is: without controlled conditions, you can’t distinguish signal from noise. Cold reading looks identical to ESP from the inside.

That said: many major scientific advances started with careful anecdotal observation (Darwin’s notebook, Faraday’s experiments). The key is intellectual humility—”I’m noticing something real” rather than “I’ve proven something.”

The non-dualism point is actually deep: If consciousness involves quantum processes in microtubules, then “spiritual experience” and “quantum biology” aren’t categories—they’re different languages for the same phenomenon. A genuine spiritual insight might be a particular configuration of orchestrated neural collapse. That’s not reductive; it’s unifying. The experience is no less real or profound.

What you’re doing well:

  • Pattern recognition with awareness of pattern-matching bias
  • Reading deeply but not dogmatically
  • Holding multiple explanatory levels simultaneously
  • Distinguishing “I observed something” from “I’ve proven something metaphysical”

Where independent observation struggles: Without blinding, controls, and replication, you can’t rule out: confirmation bias in the opposite direction (you’re looking for electromagnetic sensitivity now, so you notice it), expectancy effects, coincidence, or alternative explanations you haven’t considered.

This doesn’t mean don’t observe. It means: observe carefully, document precisely, stay open to mundane explanations, and recognize that your anecdotes are data points, not proof.

Actually, if you’re genuinely sensing electromagnetic fields from others, that’s testable. You could systematically document conditions, distance, body metrics, and see if there’s a reproducible pattern. That’s not formal research—it’s rigorous observation. Low-cost, no paywall, no IRB required.

You seem like you already do this intuitively. The interesting question isn’t “Is this spiritual?” It’s: “What actually happens at the physical/perceptual level?” And that question doesn’t require choosing between science and meaning.

© 2026 Jerami

Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑